Español | Français | Home
Return to Homepage
Search the Site Flickr Twitter Facebook Google Plus
Refine Publications

Featured Publication featured publication
From Climate-Smart Agriculture to Climate-Smart Landscapes From Climate-Smart Agriculture to Climate-Smart Landscapes
Sara Scherr, Seth Shames, Rachel Friedman

More Pubs Search the Site

Support Us how to help

Support Us
Take Action

CFC Campaign

Aid For Africa

Publications and Reports

Blending Climate and Agriculture Finance to Support Climate-Smart Landscapes

Blending Climate and Agriculture Finance to Support Climate-Smart Landscapes

Seth Shames, Sara J. Scherr, Rachel Friedman - EcoAgriculture Partners - November 2012

 

Agricultural landscapes must provide food, fiber and energy to a growing global population in a changing climate, while potentially serving as instruments for climate change mitigation. However, there is a disconnect between the ways that climate-smart landscapes will need to be managed and the current financing systems available to support them. Funds for agricultural development, food security, climate mitigation and climate adaptation generally come from different sources even though these goals are inextricably linked in agricultural systems. The consequences of this separation are inefficiency and insufficient access to financing for climate-smart agricultural development. This brief first lays out the current financing landscape for climate and agriculture in the developing world. It then analyzes the implications for the development of Climate-Smart agriculture, particularly for smallholders. Finally, it suggests steps towards more effective integration of climate and agriculture finance.

National policy for climate-smart agriculture

National policy for climate-smart agriculture

The Kenya experience

Seth Shames - November 2012

 

As the links between climate change and agriculture have become better understood in the scientific community, public policy efforts to support agricultural adaptation and mitigation have intensified. To support climate-smart agriculture, policy and financing systems will need to adapt so that these multiple objectives – adaptation and mitigation as well as rural development, food security and ecosystem services – can be achieved simultaneously. Kenya has responded to major challenges of climate change by becoming a leader in climate change policy development. This brief reviews Kenya’s experience so far, to draw out lessons for future national policy and institutional development in support of climate-smart agriculture.

Payments for watershed services in the United States

Payments for watershed services in the United States

Cost-effective strategies to align landowner incentives for abundant clean water

EcoAgriculture Partners - November 2011

 

Making REAL(U) Right

Making REAL(U) Right

Harmonizing Agriculture, Forests and Rights in the Design of REDD+

Sara J. Scherr, Seth Shames, Courtney Wallace, Jeffrey Hatcher, Andy White, Peter Minang - EcoAgriculture Partners - February 2011

 

Global attention to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) mechanisms provides an opportunity for climate protection and enhancing the livelihoods of farming and forest communities. It has become increasingly apparent that an understanding of the agricultural context of REDD+ projects is critical to success. Agriculture is a major driver of deforestation, and the fate of forests is often closely connected to the management of the agricultural landscapes in which they sit. This brief shines some light on the key REDD+, agriculture and rights linkages that require deeper thinking, and presents policy recommendations on how to address and advance mutually reinforcing climate goals.

Advances in Agricultural GHG Measurement and Monitoring

Advances in Agricultural GHG Measurement and Monitoring

Implications for Policy Makers

Christina Negra - Seth Shames - December 2010

 

Strategies for Sustainable Development in Rural Africa: A Framework for Integrating Investment in Agriculture, Food Security, Climate Response and Ecosystems

Strategies for Sustainable Development in Rural Africa: A Framework for Integrating Investment in Agriculture, Food Security, Climate Response and Ecosystems

Edward Ayensu, Jeannot Zoro Bi Bah, Martin Bwalya, Lloyd Chingambo, Sangafowa Coulibaly, Owen Cylke, Richard Fairburn, Estherine Fotabong, Minu Hemmati, Prince Kapondamgaga, Melinda Kimble, Marcia Marsh, Ibrahim Assane Mayaki, Christian Mersmann, James Nyoro, Joost Oorthuizen, algis Osman-Elasha, Sara J. Scherr, Howard Shapiro, Tesfai Tecle, Ibrahim Thiaw, George Wamukoya - Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Ghana, Government of the Cote d’Ivoire, NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency, Lloyd’s Financials Limited, Minister of Agriculture, Cote d’Ivoire, World Wildlife Fund, Unilever Corp., EcoAgriculture Partners, Farmers’ Union of Malawi, United Nations Foundation, lobal Mechanism of the UNCCD, The Rockefeller Foundation, Dutch Sustainable Trade Initiative, African Development Bank - November 2010

 

Priorities for Action

  1. Accelerate smallholder food crop production within an integrated strategy
  2. Expand and strengthen integrated landscape initiatives
  3. Ally climate action and sustainable land management
  4. Develop investment platforms for integrated rural finance
  5. Promote policy dialogue and strengthen governance to support integrated strategies

Implications of Copenhagen for climate action through SLM in Africa

Implications of Copenhagen for climate action through SLM in Africa

 

TerrAfrica-supported NEPAD country flagship programme for climate change

TerrAfrica-supported NEPAD country flagship programme for climate change

Ecoagriculture Partners - December 2009

 

Mitigating climate change through food and land use

Mitigating climate change through food and land use

Ecoagriculture Partners, Worldwatch Institute - August 2009

 

More than 30 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions arise from the land use sector. Thus, no strategy for mitigating global climate change can be complete or successful without reducing emissions from agriculture, forestry, and other land uses. Moreover, only land-based or “terrestrial” carbon sequestration offers the possibility today of large-scale removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, through plant photosynthesis.

Five major strategies for reducing and sequestering terrestrial greenhouse gas emissions are: enriching soil carbon, farming with perennials, climate-friendly livestock production, protecting natural habitat, and restoring degraded watersheds and rangelands.

Recommended policy actions:

  1. Include the full range of terrestrial emission reduction, storage, and sequestration options in climate policy and investment.
  2. Incorporate farming and land use investments in cap-and-trade systems.
  3. Link terrestrial climate mitigation with adaptation, rural development, and conservation strategies.
  4. Encourage large, area-based programs.
  5. Encourage voluntary markets for greenhouse gas emission offsets from agriculture and land use.
  6. Mobilize a worldwide, networked movement for climate-friendly food, forest, and other land-based production.

This issue of Ecoagriculture Policy Focus is based on our recent report by the same title.

Sustainable Land Management in Africa

Sustainable Land Management in Africa

Opportunities for Climate Change Adaptation

Sara J. Scherr, Sajal Sthapit, Frank Sperling - Ecoagriculture Partners, World Bank - April 2009

 

To realize the great potential for using SLM to adapt to climate change, policymakers can:

  • Scale up investments that address land management and climate risk by building on existing policy frameworks and platforms. TerrAfrica is a multi-stakeholder platform that is working to upscale and align SLM related investment in Africa. The platform supports implementation of Sub-Saharan countries’ UNCCD National Action Programs, and NEPAD’s Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP) to improve food security and productivity. TerrAfrica provides knowledge-sharing, coalition-building and coordination of country-based investments across sectors. These and other existing policy frameworks and institutions can be used as entry points for climate change adaptation that also benefits rural livelihoods.
  • Strengthen awareness and access to UNFCCC and other funding resources for climate adaptation related to agriculture and land use. Climate change funds can be blended with other financial resources to reduce project development costs and enhance local revenues, with adequate technical support and capacity development.
  • Support local, national and regional African farmer organizations to mobilize grassroots movements for adoption of SLM to respond to climate change. Adaptation to climate change requires farmers and communities to adjust land management over time and space. Understanding local-level concerns and empowering local action is essential to build resilience to climate change. Efforts are underway in a number of African countries to link producers, extension, line ministries, finance, planning, and civil society around one shared policy and investment dialogue on how to best scale up SLM.
Sources:
  1. Boko et al. 2007. Africa. In: Climate Change 2007 (IPCC, 4th Assessment Report)
  2. World Agroforestry Centre. 2009. Agroforestry Options in Tanzania. Policy Brief no. 3
  3. Pye-Smith. 2008. Farming Trees, Banishing Hunger (World Agrogorestry Centre)
  4. Haggblade and Tembo. 2003. Conservation Farming in Zambia. EPTD Discussion Paper no. 108 (IFPRI)
  5. Pender et al. 2009. The Role of SLM for Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa.
  6. World Resources Institute. 2005. World Resources 2005: The Wealth of the Poor—Managing Ecosystems to Fight Poverty

Sustainable Land Management in Africa

Sustainable Land Management in Africa

Opportunities for Increasing Agricultural Productivity and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation

Sara J. Scherr, Sajal Sthapit, Frank Sperling - Ecoagriculture Partners, World Bank - April 2009

 

Afforestation activities are already eligible for the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), and REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation) is being considered for inclusion in a post-Kyoto climate regime. But the potential contribution of agricultural land management to climate change mitigation is not recognized. Yet this is the critical element to establish landscape-scale mitigation projects that fully account for land use change. The estimated biophysical GHG mitigation potential of agricultural lands in Africa is over 1,000 MtCO2eq per year by 2030.8 To realize this great potential, policymakers can:

  • Promote the development of carbon markets that will eventually include the full range of land-use options that provide real and measurable climate and livelihood benefits. Land-use carbon accounting tools must be advanced that reliably measure those benefits from soils, trees, grasses and other components of the landscape. Including agricultural activities, afforestation and avoided deforestation in future compliance markets for GHG mitigation would increase demand for land-use based emission reductions.
  • Integrate SLM fully into national and international strategies for reducing GHG emissions and enhancing carbon sequestration within landscapes. Land-use-focused research and advisory systems should provide technologies that enhance above- and below-ground carbon sequestration and produce synergies between productivity, climate resilience and carbon sequestration.
  • Scale up investments for land management and climate change by building on existing policy frameworks and platforms. TerrAfrica is a multi-stakeholder platform to upscale and align SLM-related investment in Africa. The platform supports implementation of sub-Saharan countries’ UNCCD National Action Programs, and NEPAD’s Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP) to improve food security and productivity. TerrAfrica provides knowledge-sharing, coalition-building and coordination of country-based investments across sectors. Other existing policy frameworks can also be entry points for mitigation efforts.
  • Support local, national and regional African farmer organizations in overcoming barriers to adopt SLM technologies and accessing the carbon market. Initiatives need to develop cost-efficient methodologies for farmers to access carbon markets and their income benefits, and that lower barriers to adoption of sustainable land management practices which enhance land productivity and sustainability.
Sources:
  1. Scherr and Sthapit. 2009. Farming and Land Use to Cool the Planet. In: State of the World 2009: Into a Warming World (Worldwatch Institute)
  2. www.TerrAfrica.org
  3. Canadell, Raupach and Houghton. 2009. Anthropogenic CO2 emissions in Africa. Biogeociences 6:463-468
  4. Sohngen, Beach & Andrasko. 2008.Avoided deforestation as a greenhouse gas mitigation tool: economic issues. Journal of Environmental Quality 37:1368-1375
  5. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis (IPCC, 4th Assesment Report)
  6. Henry, Valentini and Bernoux. 2009. Soil carbon stocks in ecoregions of Africa. Biogeosciences Discussions 6:797-823
  7. Pender et al. 2009. The Role of SLM for Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa.
  8. Smith and Martino. 2007. Agriculture. In: Climate Cahnge 2007 (IPCC, 4th Assesment Report)
  9. faostat.fao.org
  10. Rice and Greenberg. 2000. Cacao Cultivation and the Conservation of Biological Diversity. Ambio 29(3):167-173
  11. Nair et al. 2009.Soil carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems: a feasibility appraisal. Environmental Science and Policy (in press)
  12. Rinaudo. 2009.Presentation at Climate Action on Poverty Reduction roundtable, Washington, DC (13 March 2009)

Evaluating biofuel opportunities from a landscape perspective

Evaluating biofuel opportunities from a landscape perspective

Ecoagriculture Partners - May 2008

 

What would a landscape managed for biofuel production look like? This brief describes three systems for biofuel production and identifies opportunities and risks for biodiversity conservation, rural livelihoods and farm production.


How can we manage landscapes to produce greener biofuels that are better for the environment and the people? The brief discusses six landscape design principles and four areas for policy development.


Ecoagriculture Policy Focus, Volume 1, Issue 2

The Policy Focus series, produced by Ecoagriculture Partners in collaboration with other organizations, highlights issues relevant to policy experts and decision makers in the fields of agriculture, conservation and rural development to promote integrative solutions.

Applying the Ecosystem Approach to Biodiversity Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes

Applying the Ecosystem Approach to Biodiversity Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes

Ecoagriculture Partners - April 2008

 

Biodiversity conservation efforts must engage agriculture more centrally. Nearly a third of the world’s landmass has crops or planted pastures as the dominant land use; another quarter of the land is under extensive livestock grazing. 80 to 90% of lands habitable by humans are affected by some form of production activity and areas critical for the conservation of genetic, species and ecosystem diversity are often most affected. More than 1.1 billion people, most directly dependent on agriculture, live within the world’s 25 biodiversity ‘hotspots’, the most threatened species-rich regions on Earth. Agriculture’s ecological ‘footprint’ will only continue to grow with rapid increases in population, higher levels of meat consumption and the emerging biofuels market.


A recent surge in research has revealed a wide range of synergistic relationships between ecological and agricultural systems, and there has been extensive documentation of sustainable practices by farmers, farming communities and agribusinesses that have found ways to maintain ecosystem integrity along with production and livelihood opportunities. This knowledge has substantially deepened our understanding of the production and conservation approaches that together lead to positive-sum interactions in agricultural landscapes, often referred to collectively as ecoagriculture. This brief draws from experience and research in ecoagriculture systems throughout the world to suggest guidelines for national and local implementation of the CBD’s Ecosystem Approach in agricultural regions.

Copyright Ecoagriculture Partners. All Rights Reserved.
1100 17th Street N.W. | Suite 600 | Washington, D.C. 20036 USA | Tel: +1 202 393 5315 | Fax: +1 202 393 2424 | info@ecoagriculture.org